What a Smarter Cricket Media Future Looks Like
Pt 5
Issue No 25
This series started with a signal. A broadcaster wobbling. A deal under pressure.
It ends with a choice.
Cricket can either keep optimising for the next cheque, or it can start building a media system that holds up when cheques wobble.
Those paths are no longer compatible.
Outcome one: cricket doubles down on dependency
This is the easy option.
Long rights cycles. One or two dominant buyers. Maximum short-term certainty. Budgets built on the assumption that the next deal will be bigger than the last.
In this world:
Boards remain price takers.
Audience data lives with platforms.
Fan experience becomes fragmented and secondary.
Any broadcaster concern triggers panic, not planning.
The money still comes in. Until it doesn’t.
When this model breaks, it breaks fast.
Outcome two: cricket builds resilience by design
This path is harder. Slower. Less comfortable.
It requires cricket to behave like a modern media property, not just a rights holder.
In this world:
Rights are structured to reduce concentration risk.
Storytelling is treated as core infrastructure, not marketing spend.
Boards retain first-party fan relationships even when licensing live rights.
Platforms become partners, not lifelines.
The upside may look smaller on paper in the short term. The system is stronger in the long term.
The uncomfortable truth
Cricket has been rewarded for scarcity, not strategy.
The game is popular. The calendar is packed. The audience is loyal. Those facts masked weak media architecture.
Now the market is asking harder questions. And cricket is being forced to answer them.
This is not about being anti-broadcaster. Broadcasters are essential.
It’s about being anti-fragility.
What smart boards will do next
The boards that win the next decade will:
Audit their media dependency honestly.
Invest in culturally credible storytelling, not corporate content.
Secure access to fan data as a non-negotiable.
Design deals that allow adjustment, not just escalation.
Put the fan experience on the same level as rights fees.
Not because it sounds good. Because it creates leverage.
What this moment really is
This is not a crisis. It’s a reset window.
Cricket rarely gets moments where the market pauses and reveals its weaknesses so clearly. This is one of them.
The decisions made now will not show up immediately. They will show up in the next rights cycle. And the one after that.
Some boards will still be negotiating from fear.
Others will be negotiating from position.
That gap is about to widen.
Final thoughts
Media rights don’t just fund the game. They shape it.
If cricket wants control over its future, it has to earn it.
Not with bigger bids.
With better systems.
Community Question
If cricket had to give up one thing to build a stronger long-term media future, what should it be: maximum short-term fees or total dependence on a single buyer?
If you enjoyed this piece, share it with someone who would love the Bat Ball Business newsletter.
It’s where the real clubhouse conversations happen — early access, deeper insights, and perks like Coffee with Carlos virtual chats and a Community Corner for your ideas.