The Hidden Cost of West Indies Cricket's Restructuring

Issue No 46

In Part 1, we looked at why Cricket West Indies has reached this point.

The economics are difficult.

Travel is extraordinarily expensive.

Revenue isn't keeping pace.

CWI has secured a US$16 million ICC loan facility.

Costs have to come down.

But there is another side to the equation.

What happens when the cost being removed is cricket?

West Indian players aren't simply earning less, increasingly, they are playing less too.

Follow the matches

The 2025 men's Super50 was reduced from eight teams and 31 matches to six teams and 16 matches.

The West Indies Academy and Combined Campuses and Colleges were removed.

Then came changes to the West Indies Championship. The traditional round-robin competition was replaced by bilateral series.

The number of matches fell from 28 to 11.

Now the men's Super50 has been suspended for this cycle.

Look at each decision individually and there is a financial explanation.

Look at them together and the domestic cricket calendar is shrinking.

When people hear that international retainers are being cut by 25%, understandably the conversation becomes about salary.

Salary is only part of a professional cricketer's economics.

Opportunity matters too.

A player earning less money but playing the same amount of cricket has taken a pay cut.

A player earning less money while also losing matches has lost something else.

Exposure. Statistics. Development. Selection opportunities. Potential franchise opportunities.

And potentially years from an already short professional career.

For established West Indies internationals, the global franchise system provides alternatives.

Our domestic structure isn't primarily supposed to serve established international players.

It is supposed to produce the next ones.

Think about the 20-year-old

This is the player I keep coming back to.

Not the West Indies international.

Not the player with an IPL, CPL or county contract.

The 20-year-old from Barbados, Guyana, Jamaica, Trinidad, the Leewards or Windwards who thinks they might be good enough.

They need matches.

A talented batter needs to fail against good bowling, then adjust, then fail differently, then score runs.

A young fast bowler needs to learn how their body handles consecutive days.

A spinner needs batters trying to attack them.

A wicketkeeper needs hundreds of overs behind the stumps.

Those experiences cannot be completely recreated at training.

You learn professional cricket by playing professional cricket.

Camps are useful. Competition is different.

Ahead of upcoming ODI commitments, CWI intends to use matches against England A and an ODI camp to prepare prospective players.

That may make sense for immediate international preparation.

A high-performance camp starts with players you already know.

Domestic competition helps you discover players you didn't.

A camp can prepare 20 players.

A domestic tournament can reveal the next 20.

That distinction becomes particularly important in 50-over cricket.

West Indies failed to qualify for the 2023 ODI World Cup.

Qualification for 2027 remains something that has to be earned.

Yet the region's main domestic 50-over tournament isn't being played this cycle.

That deserves serious discussion.

Women's cricket may face an even greater risk

There is another part of this conversation that cannot disappear.

Women's regional cricket.

The men's game has an expanding franchise ecosystem.

A good male player who establishes himself can potentially find professional opportunities across multiple countries.

Women's franchise cricket is growing quickly, but those opportunities are still concentrated among a much smaller group of players.

That makes domestic cricket even more important.

For many aspiring female cricketers, there isn't necessarily another league waiting if regional matches disappear.

Less cricket can simply mean less cricket.

And fewer players staying in the game long enough to reach international level.

So what are we actually trying to protect?

This is where the financial conversation and the cricket conversation have to meet.

CWI cannot continue operating an unsustainable model.

Protecting West Indies cricket cannot simply mean protecting the institution called Cricket West Indies.

It has to mean protecting the ecosystem that produces West Indies cricketers.

That includes national programmes. Clubs. Schools. Academies. Coaches. Regional competitions and meaningful matches.

The balance sheet exists to support that ecosystem not the other way around.

There has to be a minimum viable cricket product

This is the conversation I would like to see next.

Not simply:

How much can CWI afford?

But:

What is the minimum amount of competitive cricket West Indies needs to remain internationally competitive?

Work backwards from there.

How many first-class matches does a developing player need?

How many 50-over matches?

How much women's regional cricket?

How much Under-19 cricket?

What competitions are absolutely essential to the pathway?

Once we know that, the commercial challenge becomes clearer.

Fund that cricket.

Find partners for that cricket.

Build sponsorship inventory around it.

Ask governments to support it.

Package it digitally.

Centralise tournaments where necessary.

Change formats if necessary.

But protect the competitive opportunities.

Less money leads to less cricket.

Less cricket creates fewer opportunities.

Fewer opportunities make player development harder.

A weaker player pool can produce poorer international results.

Poorer results can make the product less commercially valuable.

And a less valuable product produces less money.

Then we start again.

That is the cycle West Indies cricket has to break.

Not merely the next budget deficit.

There is a line between becoming leaner and becoming smaller

West Indies cricket needs to find it.

CWI is right to challenge an economic model that no longer works.

US$80 million in airline expenditure over 15 years should force difficult questions.

A US$16 million loan should force difficult questions.

And a 25% reduction in international retainers should force difficult questions.

But the shrinking number of matches should force them too.

Because perhaps the most important number in this entire restructuring isn't 25%.

It isn't US$16 million.

It isn't even US$80 million.

It is the number of meaningful competitive matches available to the next generation of West Indian cricketers.

We should be watching that number very closely.

Because financial restructuring might help save the organisation.

The ultimate test is whether it helps save the cricket.

This year, reading Bat Ball Business can help us honour Kenroy Williams.
Every dollar of advertising revenue generated by the newsletter between now and PMCF Cricket will be donated to the Kenroy Williams XI, as we chase our Season 3 goal of CAD $10,000 for the Princess Margaret Cancer Foundation.
So keep clicking, keep reading, keep sharing, and when a sponsored link genuinely interests you, click for Kenroy. Small actions can help us carry his legacy forward.