Direct-to-Consumer vs Big Cheques
Pt 3
Issue No 23
Why data and storytelling now decide leverage
At some point, every board faces the same fork in the road.
Take the biggest cheque available.
Or start owning the relationship with the fan.
For a long time, cricket didn’t really have a choice. Distribution was controlled by broadcasters. Data flowed one way. Boards supplied content. Platforms captured audiences.
That balance is shifting.
Owning data is not about dashboards or CRM software. It’s about leverage.
If a board knows who its fans are, how they engage, what content they consume, and where they live, it stops being just a rights seller. It becomes a partner with an audience.
That matters in negotiations.
It matters in sponsorship.
It matters when a broadcaster starts asking hard questions about value.
Without data, boards negotiate blind.
Cricket Australia didn’t try to replace broadcasters. They did something smarter.
They leaned into creators who already had trust, tone, and cultural relevance. The Ashes build-up wasn’t just ads and promos. It was personality. Inside jokes. Long-form chat. Fan-first storytelling.
The collaboration with The Grade Cricketer worked because it didn’t feel like marketing. It felt like cricket culture talking to itself.
That is direct-to-consumer thinking without the cost of building a platform from scratch.
Storytelling creates data touchpoints that live outside the live broadcast.
Podcast listeners.
YouTube subscribers.
Email lists.
Social engagement.
Those are owned or at least shared relationships. They don’t disappear when a rights cycle ends.
That’s the quiet advantage Australia has built.
Can this be quantified?
Here’s the honest answer. Not cleanly. And that’s fine.
There is no public number that says, “Grade Cricketer added X dollars to Ashes rights value.” That’s not how this works.
What can be observed is; large, consistent audiences across podcast and video platforms, high engagement rates compared to traditional cricket marketing. Cultural penetration that broadcasters then amplify.
This is not a conversion funnel. It’s brand gravity.
Trying to reduce it to one metric misses the point.
Broadcast deals are built on spreadsheets. Fan loyalty isn’t.
The value of Grade Cricketer is that it keeps cricket present between matches. It humanises players. It sustains interest. It feeds the ecosystem that broadcasters rely on.
That emotional layer is what platforms struggle to manufacture themselves.
Boards that ignore this layer leave value on the table.
Not every board should chase direct-to-consumer aggressively.
But every board should:
Own its archive rights where possible.
Control at least one direct fan channel.
Invest in culturally credible storytelling, not corporate noise.
Retain access to first-party data even when licensing content.
Direct-to-consumer does not mean independence. It means optionality.
Big cheques buy certainty.
Owned audiences buy resilience.
The smartest boards will blend both.
Those who don’t will remain dependent on decisions they don’t control.
What comes next
Part 4 will look at the risk that sits on the other side of this shift.
Fan fatigue. Subscription overload. Fragmentation.
Football shows us what happens when monetisation outruns experience.
Cricket would be wise to pay attention.
Community Question
Should cricket boards be investing more in owning fan data and storytelling platforms, or is that a distraction from maximising broadcast revenue while the money is still strong?
If you enjoyed this piece, share it with someone who would love the Bat Ball Business newsletter.
It’s where the real clubhouse conversations happen — early access, deeper insights, and perks like Coffee with Carlos virtual chats and a Community Corner for your ideas.